Sign in for registered users
The breakdown of private Russia-NATO diplomacy increases the risks of a terrible event The ongoing standoff over Ukraine is increasingly becoming a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO, raising serious concerns about the risk of nuclear escalation. In this new phase, both ...
... to cooperate and, therefore, to give up their sovereign rights decreased. Since the second half of the 1960s, European integration has been developing in such a way as not to pose a significant threat to the monopoly of the national elites on power. NATO, as the most organised and effective military alliance in history, serves as an example of how significant for cooperation is the presence of a formal or informal leader. From the very beginning, this organisation was created under the leadership ...
... international position is defined by its crushing defeat in the Second World War, which ended any hope of determining its own future. Germany, like Japan and South Korea, is a country with a foreign occupying force on its territory, albeit under the NATO flag. The German elite, both political and economic, is, with few exceptions, even more integrated with the US than the British elite. To say nothing of those running France, Italy or other European countries. Germany has no autonomy in determining ...
..., Tevfik Rüştü Aras, 33 at the instruction of Prime Minister Ismet Inönü, made a proposal to Litvinov that the sides conclude a bilateral Pact according to which the USSR would be obligated to provide assistance to Turkey in the defense of its Anatolia coastline and the Straits, while Turkey would be committed to closing the Straits in the event that the USSR was attacked 34 . However, the promising proposal proved to be unrealizable due to staunch opposition from the UK [İşçi, 2020а: 749–750]....
... the Russian language, and respect the rights and freedoms of its citizens. The Istanbul Agreements initialed on 29 March 2022 by the Russian and Ukrainian delegations could serve as a basis for the settlement. They provide for Kiev's refusal to join NATO and contain security guarantees for Ukraine while recognizing the realities on the ground at that moment. Needless to say, in over two years, these realities have considerably changed, including in legal terms. On 14 June, President Vladimir Putin ...
The possibility of Lapland becoming a central NATO stronghold in Northern Europe would be a new major chapter in the alliance's “Arctic pivot”. NATO troops and a new command centre may soon appear right next door to Santa Claus's “village”, as Finland and its allies negotiate over the ...
... the last 30 years that no one has dared to speak openly about this fact in countries that claim to be part of the ‘community of liberal democracies’. And Georgia is one of those. Especially given that nobody there has abandoned the goal of joining NATO and the EU. The Georgian authorities are thus taking the liberty of directly contradicting the basic world order imposed on everyone by the Americans. Which is that the laws and norms of the UN apply to everyone except to the US itself. And since ...
... to the current ‘European values’ under American auspices. As mentioned above, the breakthrough of the former ‘outcasts’ into the first echelon does not mean a rearrangement of the elites, but instead the normalization of the newcomers. The EU/NATO framework has a high safety margin to keep the political field within the same parameters. This brings us to the question of whether we should expect any changes in course that would affect Russian interests. So far, the answer is no. Source: RT
... Western Europeans that if they do not “invest fully” in supporting Kiev, they may end up with a war on their own territory. It is telling that almost no one in the EU dares to publicly ask whether Moscow is interested in a direct armed conflict with NATO. What would its aims be in such a war? And what price would it be willing to pay? Obviously, even posing such questions could lead to accusations of spreading Russian propaganda. Our country takes note of provocative statements made by our northwestern ...
It is difficult to imagine that a new system of global and regional security can be based on the “good old” European principles NATO and the SCO represent two opposing concepts of ensuring international security: through control over the internal politics of the states included in the system, and through intensive diplomatic dialogue between them. We cannot now say with certainty ...
| U.S. wants to establish partnership relations with Russia on condition that it meets the U.S. requirements |
|
| U.S. wants to deter Russia’s military and political activity |
|
| U.S. wants to dissolve Russia |
|
| U.S. wants to establish alliance relations with Russia under the US conditions to rival China |
|
